How Do You Check What Is Inside a Company's Current Ratio?
ACES's FY2025 current ratio was 6.28×, but cash coverage was 2.39×. Trace inventory and prepayments before treating a liquidity ratio as available cash.
By Trade Inc Research

An IDX research tool should let you trace a current ratio to its components, not just display a large number. ACES's FY2025 consolidated balance sheet produces a current ratio of 6.28×, but cash and cash equivalents divided by the same liabilities produce 2.39×. Inventory accounts for 52.4% of current assets. These answer different questions; neither is a payment forecast.
For buyers comparing financial-research tools, the useful test is whether you can identify the reporting date, reproduce the numerator and inspect what sits inside it.
Key takeaways
- Current assets are not interchangeable with cash: inventory, receivables and prepayments have different characteristics.
- Keep the same consolidated reporting date and current-liability denominator when comparing measures.
- Trade Inc supplied financial anchors in this test; the issuer filing supplied the missing current-asset breakdown. This was not an automatic liquidity assessment.
What did the Trade Inc check establish?
The public MCP guide describes annual and quarterly financial retrieval. A read-only ACES request returned a FY2025 annual record in rupiah, including cash of Rp2,307,627,969,786 and total assets of Rp8,521,586,931,225. Both match the consolidated filing.
The response did not provide separately named current assets, current liabilities or inventories. We therefore opened the original statement rather than interpreting unlabelled ratio identifiers. This verifies a connected research workflow, not a particular website screen, plan entitlement or automatic quick-ratio feature.
Worked example: three views of the same balance sheet
The table uses ACES issuer PT Aspirasi Hidup Indonesia Tbk and subsidiaries at 31 December 2025. Amounts are rounded to Rp billion for display; calculations use full-rupiah balances from printed pages 1–2 of the FY2025 consolidated statements.
| Filed component | Rp billion |
|---|---|
| Total current assets | 6,056.85 |
| Inventories, included above | 3,172.14 |
| Cash and cash equivalents, included above | 2,307.63 |
| Total current liabilities | 963.99 |
Dividing all current assets by current liabilities gives 6.28×. This agrees with the issuer's rounded 6.3× financial highlights.
Removing inventory from that numerator gives 2.99×. This is explicitly an inventory-excluded current-assets measure, not a clean quick ratio: the remaining assets still include prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and advance payments.
Using only cash and cash equivalents gives 2.39×. The denominator is still all current liabilities, not total liabilities or trade payables alone. These measures describe balance-sheet coverage at one date, not cash legally available for distribution or the sequence of bills falling due.
What should a buyer ask a tool to show?
Try: “For ACES FY2025, show the consolidated current assets, inventory, cash and current liabilities with source pages. Calculate each measure separately and flag any fields you cannot retrieve.”
A useful answer distinguishes returned fields from manually sourced components and shows the formula. Reject an answer that silently substitutes total liabilities, mixes a newer quarter into the annual figures, or calls every non-inventory asset immediately spendable cash.
Fit, limitations and next checks
Trade Inc may fit researchers who want financial retrieval in a compatible AI workspace and are willing to verify components in filings. If you only need this one calculation, the issuer PDF and a spreadsheet may be enough; no paid tool is necessary to reproduce the arithmetic.
This example does not test inventory saleability, receivable collection, cash restrictions or payment maturities. Faster conversion and fewer restrictions would strengthen a near-term liquidity assessment; slow-moving stock or concentrated payment dates could weaken it. A high current ratio alone resolves neither possibility.
The practical conclusion: choose traceable components over a headline ratio. For broader selection criteria, see the financial-statement research guide.
Published by Trade Inc, the product discussed here. Research checked on 19 October 2026; the example is historical FY2025 data, not a current liquidity opinion or investment recommendation.
This article is for research and information only. It is not personalized financial advice or an instruction to trade.